Tuesday, 24 May 2011

Net Neutrality finally in Europe

Net Neutrality in Europe

May 25, 2011 is a deadline for all 27 Member States of the European Union for provisions - of revised EU regulatory framework - to be transposed into national regulations.

Why the new EU Regulatory Framework is so important? The amended telecoms framework adopted in 2009 favours the preservation of the open and neutral character of the Internet, which safeguard users' rights to access and distribute information online and ensure transparency about traffic management.

Under the revised rules, national telecoms regulatory authorities are required to promote the ability of end users to access and distribute information or run applications and services of their choice (Article 8 of the Framework Directive). This is supported by new transparency requirements (Article 21 of the Universal Service Directive).

When subscribing to a service and in case of any changes thereafter, consumers will be informed about:
  • conditions limiting access to and/or use of services and applications, in conformity with Union law,
  • procedures put in place by the provider in order to measure and shape traffic so as to avoid filling or overfilling a network link, and how these may impact on service quality,
  • minimum service quality levels offered, namely the time for the initial connection and, where appropriate, other quality of service parameters, as defined by the national regulatory authorities, 
Thanks to the new Universal Service Directive, safeguards for preserving the open and neutral character of the internet are provided for in the regulatory framework and NRAs should avail themselves of the provisions under Article 22 and set appropriate minimum quality of service requirements, where they are made aware of degradation of service, hindering or slowing down of traffic over networks.


The following regulations are to be transposed into national regulation no later than May 25, 2011:
  • Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services, Directive 2002/58/EC concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws;
  • Directive 2009/140/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services

Are those regulations already transposed…? The answer is… NO. It’s European Union and national administrations are not - let’s say - “effective”. European Commission will review the results of the new regulations by November 2011, so we may expect that majority (?) of Member States will implement majority (?) of the new regulations by November

Saturday, 14 May 2011

Disney steals Seals?

Source: link to disney.com
Just recently Disney Enterprises Inc. claimed right on the "SEAL TEAM 6". Information about Team 6 of Navy Seals raid on Osama bin Laden's compound in Pakistan has been released on May 1, 2011. Disney filled applications on... May 3rd.

Disney’s trademark applications for Clothing, footwear and headwear, toys, games and playthings; gymnastic and sporting articles (except clothing); hand-held units for playing electronic games other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; Christmas stockings; Christmas tree ornaments and decorations; snow globes. Wow, sounds strange...

Source: USPTO
Disney's action is the perfect example of unjustified desire to profit from the other people achievements.  I'm curious if the TM will pass the United States Patent and Trademark Office, but at least in most European countries it would be declined... 

Huffington Post commented on this saying: It remains to be seen what products will come of these trademarks, but the bin Laden raid video game and pajama set has to be just around the corner.





Wednesday, 11 May 2011

Obama could send text-message warnings directly to your mobile

FEMA announced that the US Government is introducing a new emergency alert system, which is an expansion of the Federal Communications Commission's existing emergency alert system, which is designed to broadcast warnings over radio and television.The new system called PLAN (Personal Localized Alerting Network), instead of broadcasting alerts via radio and TV, will send text messages directly to mobile phones.

Nokia Siemens BTS
PLAN enables government officials to target alerts to specific geographic areas. Messages will be sent to mobile devices based on their geographic location determined by BTS (base transceiver station). No need for GPS support will be required - all cell phones in the range of base stations located in the area will receive SMS with warning message (actually SMS-CB).

This solution (SMS to be sent to all phones in targeted area) is actually the simplest and the most effective in emergency communications. Existing means of alerting people of immediate danger like warning horns, sirens, public address system with loudspeakers, TV or radio broadcast are not always efficient. Horns or announcements may be mistaken with non-crucial "background" voice or some people may just not hear the alert sound. The best example is Japan's tsunami where many people were not alerted on time, despite the fact that alert about tsunami has reached emergency centers 30 (!) minutes before tsunami reached the shoreline.

PLAN allows national, state or local government officials in the US send alerts regarding public safety emergencies, such as a tornado, tsunami or a terrorist threat without delay. Thanks to the possibility to alert mobile phones in the affected areas only, we make sure, that alerts will not create unnecessary panic and people will not start ignoring alerts as irrelevant.

What is also very important, GSM or CDMA based emergency alert systems are relatively cheap if compared to traditional warning systems based on the several layers of bureaucracy and 20th century traditional technologies. Alerting systems based on short-messages are also easy to deploy in a very short time. 

I must say, that I'm very happy that such system will be finally implemented at least in the United States. Few years ago I tried to convince authorities from European Commission as well as representatives of at least three European governments to build similar system.  Unfortunately, instead of focusing on the project similar to "PLAN", European Commission decided to start implementation of the eCall system (automatic notification of motor crashes). The main reason behind implementation of eCall was to... follow the US deployment of ACN. As the result, European Union countries neither have working eCall/ACN nor the Short Message Service-Cell Broadcast-based public alerting system like PLAN.


More info:

Thursday, 5 May 2011

Department of Commerce on .XXX domain for porn sites

Courtesy: ISOC
Here is the letter from Lawrence E. Strickling, Assistant Secretary of Commerce, Department of Commerce, US Government to Commissioner Neelie Kroes, Vice President of the European Commission on the .XXX and further Internet Governance issues.

The key points:
  • Obama Administration does not support decision of ICANN to approve Registry contact with ICM Registry on .XXX domain delegation
  • ICANN ignored the "clear advice" from governments including the US Gov
  • USG respects the multi-stakeholder process
  • ICANN Board took its action without the full support of the community
  • DoC is dedicated to improve the responsiveness of ICANN to all stakeholders